A UC Davis study shows that teens in a "romantic sexual relationship" are far less likely to commit crimes, do drugs, or otherwise fuck up their lives, than their slutty peers who don't experience romance but have reckless sex anyway. What about our abstinence-only peers? They have low crime-rates as well, which means that it's not the lack of sex, but the lack of morals that mess up kids' lives. If you ask me, however, which is better: sex ed with sex, or sex ed without sex? Dude, let the kids have sex, do it right, and they might turn out better than you thought.